Annotated Bibliography Review

I kind of saw this coming.  I have a lot of work to do.  After seeing an example in class I feel like I have a better idea of how detailed the annotation should be.  As I said in my other post, my structure and/or format was pretty good with the exception of the header.  I totally spaced on that one.  Overall, it doesn't look like the Annotated Bibliography will give me too many problems down the line.  All I need to do is make it a little more detailed and add the header and I'll be satisfied.

Annotated Bibliography

I decided to go along the route of choosing the "Adopted Children's Identity Rights" for my topic.  The annotated bibliography was a bit of a hassle in that some of the sources I found, I would print out and when I went back to find the source online, it would not be accessable.  A great pain? Yes, I think so.  Anyways, I'm not entirely sure if my paper really hit the spot on what an annotated bibliography is supposed to accomplish because I didn't fully understand what was supposed to be included in the description of each source.  However, it should have the correct formatting, structure, and each description gives a pretty vague idea of what you can find in each source, so I think it should do just fine for a rough draft.  I'm interested to see what will be the next step in shaping up this paper.  I only hope that I will not have to do a complete overhaul on the entire work.